Jeff Koons, Richard Prince and Copyright Infringement

A good article in the Wall Street Journal here, with good images for comparison, on the claim of photographer Patrick Cariou that artist Richard Prince had ripped him off. It's not the first time that a photographer has been upset over Prince's actions. Someone sent me a NY Times article on the original photographer who did the Marlboro Man campaigns that Prince copied.

Now I know Cariou's name - Prince has made him and his work more famous, and the two will probably make more money in their respective careers following the tiff than before, no matter what the end result.

The WSJ article discusses cases involving Jeff Koons, the puppies case and the more recent Niagara case (image here). I met Jeff Koons last night for the first time at the National Arts Club where he was being presented with a medal.

We discussed his litigations, and he said that they have really changed his work.

In a visual online world where "free speech" for a visual artist may include defacing the work of another, we are going to see a lot of boundaries changing. What's fair today may not be fair tomorrow.

International Copyright CLE Program Online

I recently participated in a continuing legal education program at the New York County Lawyers' Association called International Copyright: What the U.S. Practitioner Needs To Know.

The CLE session is available on DVD from NYCLA or online at Lawline here. We had a great panel, moderated by Jay Kogan of D.C. Comics that included Axel Nordemann and Christian Czychowski from Boehmert & Boehmert in Germany, Johnny Chen of Divx, and Mario Sorensen Garcia from Brazil. Faculty bios here.

The program covered not only the legal concepts of international copyright and interpreting the treaties, but had a number of "real life" stories about how businesses working internationally protect and enforce copyrights.

My topic was "Foreign Copyrights in U.S. Courts".

The course description below:

Since United States copyrights are a major export, many practitioners are called upon to protect clients’ interests worldwide and negotiate licensing agreements requiring a knowledge of copyright regimes around the world. In-house counsel and outside counsel are also often called upon to assist U.S. clients in solving copyright problems worldwide.
This program identified the problems that arise for U.S. clients and provided drafting tips, together with a survey of the analytical tools and resources necessary for a U.S. practitioner to effectively craft practical solutions.

London Underground cutting 1,000 jobs

Looks like the doom and gloom of the recession has finally hit the Tube as London Underground announce that 1,000 people will lose their jobs.


Unlike the picture of skeleton staff above implies, LU said no front line staff or Tube drivers, would be out of a job, the cuts would be from temporary and administrative posts.

However, as we'd probably expect with the railway unions, they are saying they will fight the cuts, as they believe the reduction in jobs will lead to a reduced service.

Gerry Doherty, leader of TSSA, said: "This is a real body blow for staff and the London travelling public. There is no way that cuts of this size will not hit services. We should be investing in the Underground in the run up to the Olympics, not cutting back."

Bob Crow, leader of the RMT, was more bullish and hinted at strike action as a result of the announcement: "Any attempt to impose compulsory redundancies among our members or to undermine their terms and conditions will be met with a ballot for industrial action."

He added "Once again it seems if you are a banker you get protection, but if you are part of a team providing a public service you don't. There is no way that London's transport workers should be made to pay for the failure of the bankers and privateers whose greed has created the crisis our economy is now in."

He also agreed with Doherty by saying "There is no way that redundancies on this scale can be implemented without affecting the level of service. If the mayor is looking for efficiencies he should bring the Tube Lines PPP contracts back in house, because they are still draining huge sums of public money from London’s transport budget."


The London Underground employs about 20,000 staff, and the jobs which are slated to go are from finance, IT, procurement, human resources, legal and administration.

For once I tend to agree with Bob Crow (well not about the threat of strikes bit, which he plays too often). I find it hard to see how an organisation can lose that many staff - in whatever functions - and for this to make no difference to the service it provides to the public.

Friday on the Tube

And in the midst of all the recession misery, some staff on the London Underground can still try to remind us one good thing:


Spotted by the lovely Melanie Seasons this morning at Warwick Avenue Tube. She said "The man who works there in the morning always writes the most ridiculous happy-go-lucky messages on the status board and I finally caught one.".

Stop Standing on my Feet Postcard

I wish this had been made into an official poster for the London Underground. The cartoon postcard below from the London Transport Museum deals brilliantly with two common Tube complaints. Standing on other people's feet when it's overcrowded AND the hot potato about giving up seats.


The disgruntled gentleman seated is moaning as a woman is standing on his feet. "I say Missus, if you're anything of a lady you'd stop standing on my feet". The lady gives back an answer that I'd love to have given myself. "Well, If you're anything of a gentleman you'd start standing on 'em yourself".

So even in Edwardian times, it certainly wasn't given than a man would give up his seat for a woman. I don't expect to be given a seat on account of being a woman, but I if a man offers me a seat (which happens occasionally), I'll gladly take it. I don't know if that makes me feeble, but it's nice that some old fashioned courtesies still exist.

However, I know that a number of men say they won't give up their seat, as they're worried that women will take offence. I think this is mainly down to the dilemma of suggesting that you're only giving up your seat because you think the woman's pregnant.


I wonder if the Edwardian postcard approach would work any better than TfL's current Considerate Londoner / Together for London campaign? There is a poster in the series above which has one of the numpty cartoon characters saying "I'll offer that person my seat" and a female numpty saying something like "I'll politely take it".

It's trying to promote a little give and take or to quote the campaign: "A little thought from each of us, makes a big difference for everyone." Maybe they should test a more humorous or blunt standpoint as seen in the postcard, unless that would lead to even more raised tempers!

Lap sitting on the Tube

Why don't more couples take a leaf out of the book of this pair? This Monday morning on a packed Piccadilly Line, instead of taking up two seats, this guy and girl shared a seat and had a cosy read of Metro.


A nice public display of affection on the London Underground that didn't make the rest of us feel like saying "Get a room".


If only they had sat under the above sign promoting peak hour sitting (spotted by Whatleydude) the picture would have been perfect!

ICANN Copyright Registration? Yes We Can!

Professional photographer Dan Heller has written a very thoughtful and constructive piece about how the Copyright Office might incorporate ICANN-type concepts into the copyright registration process found here. I am a big fan of the Copyright Office in many ways. Unlike many, I usually see attempts to "privatize" government functions as a way to steal from taxpayers and undermine the professional civil service. For example, I think HMO's are simply criminal in structure, and I think that private prisons should be abolished immediately.

Heller makes powerful arguments that today's copyright system prices most photographers and certain content producers out of the market and is inefficient. At $35 or $45 a pop, and high recording fees for transfers, certain content creators simply opt out of the system. Photographers may register multiple images for one fee, but there are restrictions. With the phenomenon of user-generated content exploding, Heller points out another copyright constituency that is priced out, is opting out, and that the system was not built for.

As a litigator it has pained me to inform clients over and over that they can't get statutory damages. It is clear to me that approaches embracing new technology, recognizing the new scope of copyright itself, and harnessing the power of the internet need to be adopted to the commercial and consumer reality of the online experience. Heller is right about there being no reasonably effective remedies for the little guy out there.

If you could protect all of your creative output for, say, a reasonable monthly fee and make it easy to digitally track and monitor, wouldn't that be a great option?

Heller has sketched, in a provocative and powerful essay the outline of a new type of automated copyright registration system that certainly bears study. His selected model is the ICANN system, which I am not sure satisfies my desire to have one, central entity to be searched and act as a reputable register (if you have ever chased domain name hijackers who have taken your client's domain offshore you will understand my reluctance to endorse domain name registration as a flawless model).

There is also something attractive in the deposit system: you can deposit works and still have them unpublished and secret for practical purposes, but you have a secure government record that it is what you've claimed as yours, even if unpublished. I am not sure that an ICANN-type system could provide the type of physical custody and certainty that the US government provides.

I think that the Copyright Office would do well to give Heller's proposal some serious consideration and launch a pilot program, particular for groups like photographers. By providing careful oversight of an outsourced operation like the one Heller envisions, I think that the Copyright Office might find that more people could receive fair legal protections at a reduced cost and that more creators and users would be encouraged to be good copyright citizens.

Tube Toilet & Step Free Tube Maps Launched

The London Underground have launched two maps that will show you where to spend a penny and where you won't have to climb stairs when using the Tube.

"The Tube Toilet map shows which stations have male, female and accessible toilets for wheelchair users, whether they are inside or outside the ticket gates, and whether they have baby changing facilities.


The Step-free Tube Guide gives information about the step and gap between the train and platform at step-free stations, and gives information about the stations where you can change between lines without encountering steps or escalators.

This guide will also help passengers with heavy luggage or those with children's buggies." said TfL on their site.


These are great moves forward with the map and very much like the idea explored with AccessCity. Still at beta stage it was one of the finalists in Social Innovation Camp (which I've actually been trying to get in front of the powers that be at TfL and Tube Lines).

Thanks to Kevin from Travolution for giving me the heads up on the new maps.

The current Tube map has wheelchair symbols showing step free access stations, but the new accessibility guide has a map with:

• Green, amber or red symbols on step-free access stations showing the height of the step between the platform and the train, coupled with a coloured ruler on the side of the map so that people can visualise how high the step is


• Information about the width of the gap between platform and train and different symbols to show stations which are step-free when changing between lines, but where it's not possible to get in or out of the station without using stairs or an escalator

When looking at the map, it was surprising (for me anyway) to see how little of the London Underground was actually step free.

What's also interesting is that people on the net have been playing about with maps like the above for years, and yet TfL have only just got round to officially producing them (better late than never).


Geoff produced an unoffical map with toilets on it in 2007 (admittedly to help those doing all day Tube challenges) and Last Rounds Project has an interactive map showing which Tube stations have public toilets near them.

Hopefully, TfL will have less of a "down with this sort of thing" approach to unofficial maps and look on them as ideas which the public might actually find useful. They (sort of) gave us that impression at the blogger's briefing last year.

Are there any other versions of the Tube map you would like to see? If you had design freedom & the sky was the limit, what would you find useful on the London Underground map?

I really think that the Way Out Tube map, which shows you where to get on to get off (so to speak) should be a free map. It's helped me shave several minutes off my journey and when you're in a rush every minute counts.

Atheist Tube Ad

Many of you will have heard about The Atheist Bus, or rather the bus advertising campaign that was paid for by people who don't believe in God's existence. You might have also heard about the bus driver - Ron Heather who refused to drive a bus with the advert on it. Well, thanks to Bloo Phoenix I saw that the atheist campaign has got past the powers that be on the London Underground too.


Rather amazingly First Bus said it would do everything in its power to ensure Mr Heather didn't have to drive the buses with the advert on it.

First Bus said: "As a company we understand Mr Heather's views regarding the atheist bus advert and we are doing what we can to accommodate his request not to drive the buses concerned."

"As an organisation we don't endorse any of the products or sentiments advertised on our buses. The content of this advert has been approved by the Advertising Standards Agency and therefore it is capable of being posted on static sites or anywhere else."

Now isn't this setting a worrying precedent? Do you think that RMT leader, Bob Crow will get Tube drivers up in arms and suggest they refuse to drive London Underground trains with ads in them they don't like?

I've seen ads for all sorts of religions & belief systems inside Tube carriages and I'm sure there are plenty of people (including Tube drivers) that don't agree with the sentiments on the advertisements.


What about entire London Underground trains that are covered in adverts? Wouldn't it be a bit weird for TfL to say "Ah that's alright, you don't agree with London having the 2012 Olympics, so we'll let you off driving the Tube today"?

Update - 27th Jan 2009 - saw another version of the ad this morning


Like how this one is less Dawkins driven and a lot more positive & life affirming, but I suspect it still wouldn't make Mr Heather and many others happy.

Scholarly Access To Images

The Max Planck Institute for the History of Science has put out a sheet called "Best Practices for Access to Images: Recommendations for Scholarly Use and Publishing." The practices identify restrictions that have been put on access to public domain works for researchers in the humanities and talks about how scholars should be restricted in how they use images of public domain works.

In recently researching a case of Nazi looted art, I have been frustrated by non-profit institutions blocking access to copies of documents necessary to trace Nazi-art looting practices in Switzerland. One institution was the Getty blocking access to an official government report, another a German museum claiming that I had to get copyright permission from a deceased Swiss art dealer to make copies of his correspondence with the Nazi regime. Each institution was informed that the documents were for use in an impending court case.

My feeling is that any restrictions on scholarly use of public domain materials by an entity that enjoys tax-free status is presumptively a violation of the public trust, and a restriction of the public domain that conflicts with the complete preemption of copyright law. Only in certain limited cases should museum and library archives be banned from public view, and certainly not unclassified Nazi-era documents. I am sensitive to the fact that libraries and institutions cannot exist on thin air and that some financial support is necessary. If endowments and other funds do permit subsidized access, charging scholars for access should be the last resort.

In the Dastar case the court worried about mutant species of copyright laws making public domain materials unavailable forever, and was explicit that public domain meant the right to use without attribution. Didn't Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp., which held that exact copies of public domain images are not protected by copyright resolve these issues?

Charging fair access fees on an equitable basis (akin to charging for photocopies) seems reasonable. But museums, now all too often acting as a multibillion-dollar theme park industry focused on building new wings and expanding their parking lots, have a tendency to want to cash in to the max on every aspect of merchandising the cultural property in their grasp. If they want to do that, they are violating their core missions and should be taxed like everyone else.

I am grateful to many amazing librarians I have known over the years. I am supportive of this type of research in the humanities. And I don't mind mentioning that the image appearing above, which is a link to the Max Plaenck website, is an image created by Rembrandt of Aristotle with the Head of Homer and that it is to be found at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. But should I be required to do so? And what if it turns out not to be a Rembrandt?

Walk the Tube to get healthy

January's the time of year when memberships to gyms rise and more people resolve to get active to work off their Christmas grub. So it's no surprise to see the launch of yet another London Underground map to encourage us walk between stops rather than take the Tube.


PruHealth got together with a team of volunteers with pedometers to count the number of steps between Tube stations in zone one and plotted them onto a map.

The BBC report that: "the average person would take 99 steps in walking between Cannon Street and Monument stations and 2,438 steps from King's Cross to Farringdon.

The British Heart Foundation recommends walking 10,000 steps per day. PruHealth said it would take the average person 75 minutes to walk that number of steps, but it would help protect them from stroke, diabetes and some forms of cancer."

I wonder when we're ever going to get an official map from TfL which publishes information like this on a printed map? The "walk the Tube" map idea has been created before by students at Central Saint Martins College in 2007


This had the average times to walk between stations on it, rather than the number of steps.

Back in 2003 rodcorp came up with an idea of a map showing walkways between Tube stations showing where it's "quicker to walk on the Tube map".


I suppose that TfL would never be able to agree on what "average" walking times were. Although they do deliberately encourage people to walk between Leicester Square and Covent Garden or Holborn and Covent Garden, rather than travel the one stop by Tube.


The students seem to be much more optimistic than TfL with the walking times between those stations.

Admittedly, the Tube have those signs as an effort to reduce congestion and not a health kick. There must be many other journeys like this on the Tube, but I've never seen "walk rather than travel by Tube" displayed on any other in carriage maps. Maybe PruHealth should be encouraged to sponsor an official Tube pocket map, which would give loads more awareness to their campaign.

Who saw docu-drama Stockwell on TV?

I'm kicking myself that I forget to record last night's factual drama Stockwell. This is all the more annoying for me as earlier that day I attended an Amplified09 discussion about the Future of Online Video. I remember saying that I couldn't remember the last time I used my VCR and that commonly people want to watch more TV on demand on a variety of devices.

It will be one of those programmes that I'll end up watching when it becomes available online on ITV1's iPlayer (but normally I'm old skool and prefer to watch anything over 15 minutes from my sofa.


But I digress, Stockwell, was going to be a fairly emotive film as no one still really knows the catalogue of events and errors that led to shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes in a Tube carriage at Stockwell London Underground, after he was mistaken for a failed suicide bomber.

The press release says "Based on the evidence given during the criminal trial and inquest, the hour-long programme recreates the actions of the police surveillance and firearms teams in the hours leading up to the innocent 27-year-old's death.

The programme opens on the Stockwell Tube with the sound of screaming and chaos. As undercover police officers charge into a waiting train, people can be seen running from the carriage."

The review from The Telegraph puts a lot more colour to this "Firearms officers arrived at Stockwell Tube station after de Menezes had gone down the escalator. We saw the killing in slow motion, which made the seven shots to the head seem more gratuitous than they were. In reality, de Menezes was doomed from the moment he entered the station, pursued by firearms officers who thought he was a suicide bomber about to blow a carriage to smithereens. Given their belief, they did what most armed officers would do: they made sure he was as dead as possible as quickly as possible


But the belief was wrong, and even now we don't know exactly how they acquired it. Who should be blamed for the shocking delay, and who (if anyone) positively identified de Menezes as the bomber? Stockwell did not guess, but subtly led us to the correct inference that someone at the Met has something to answer for. So, despite the odd melodramatic flourish, this was public service broadcasting in the true sense of the term – and a very fine piece of work.."

I would love to know if anyone watched it last night and what you thought of it. As the film is based on evidence from the criminal trial and inquest, I wonder how many of you will make similar conclusion to the Telegraph reviewer?

"So why was Stockwell shocking? The answer is that – forgive the cliché – it turned 'unknown unknowns' into 'known unknowns'. Perhaps it's just laziness on my part, but I find it hard to visualise detailed media reports of events as complicated as this one. Until last night's programme, I didn't know how many questions about that morning remain unresolved. Now that I do, I can understand why the anger surrounding this case refuses to die down."

If you're in the UK you can watch Stockwell on ITV player it's on their site for the next 30 days.

Future of the Tube

At the London Transport Museum last week, I saw an amazing print of how the London Underground & transport in London might look in the future. It was drawn from around 1790 - 1830. Unfortunately I can't remember the exact date and who the artist was (if someone knows can they let me know), but I love seeing people's visions of the future from hundreds of years ago to compare with how things really are now.


The above image is a cartoon so not meant to be entirely serious, but it's brilliant to see the cartoonist imagine the London Tube, or rather the Grand Vacuum Tube Company, going directly to Bengal from London.

There's a wagon below the Tube predicting London to Bath in six hours. Also the futuristic Steam Horse Velocity meant "No sloppage on the road". If you look carefully at the flying pig in the air, you'll see that it's an airship full of convicts bound for New South Wales. Enlarge the picture and you'll see many other predictions for the transport in London.

I wonder how many people will be looking at Transport for London's current plans for the system in 2012 in a 100 or 200 years time and shaking their heads or laughing?

Update - thanks to Mother of the Bride - found out that it was drawn by William Heath around 1830 (so my guess of timing wasn't too bad) and is called March of Intellect

Barack Obama on the Tube again

I wonder how many of messages like the one below London Underground staff will be able to get away with today?


This was taken by Andrew Grill on the day of the presidential results at Holland Park Tube Station.

Wishing all the best for the Inauguration today and let's hope that we'll be able to see this image from The Times campaign teaser campaign last year come true when the new President visits London.


Just a quick heads up if you live or work in Windsor, you'll be able to get a free scoop of Ben & Jerry's limited edition ice cream "Yes, Pecan", from their shop today between 12 noon and 2pm.

Simon Cowell on the Tube ... err Subway

I'm a big American Idol fan, but unfortunately haven't got round to watching the auditions on TV in the UK yet. However, regular reader 49erDweet watched it last week and has a brilliant story of one of the auditions:


"I just watched the US season premiere of American Idol - we Tivo'd it a day earlier - and almost choked when Simon Cowell - ostensibly the best known Brit in America - couldn't remember what to call the London Underground.

A young, blind contestant, Scott MacIntyre, came onto the show - the very last contestant of the two hour premiere - wearing a white "Mind The Gap" T shirt. During the interview he said he wore the shirt in honour of Simon. Cowell nodded for a moment and then said, "Oh yes, the subway right?". There was a little more to it but we were laughing so hard we may have missed it. Shaking our heads. Unbelievable. It was obvious he couldn't remember the name of "The Tube" and simply substituted the standard North American term.

A copy should be sent to the Queen so she can start the process of revoking his peerage and citizenship, because regardless of the accent, he's obviously now a Yank."

You can play the video here to judge for yourself, but maybe 49erDweet was being a bit harsh on Cowell, as he could have just been saying "subway" so the US viewers would understand what the roundel meant.

Either way it's funny Cowell has become fairly Americanised. He probably couldn't even remember the last time he went on the Tube and maybe genuinely had to dredge the familiar symbol from the recesses of his mind.

Illegal Downloading of Software: Czech Cracker Leeches Warez Gets 30

In U.S. v. Klimecek, 2009 WL 102128 (7th Cir. January 15, 2009), the Seventh Circuit upheld a 30-month sentence for a member of a warez group who downloaded Czech movies and music. The decision does not state that any of these works were registered with the Copyright Office. Italics below are from the decision:

He was indicted under 17 U.S.C. § 506(a)(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319(c)(1) for willfully infringing copyrights by reproducing or distributing during a 180-day period at least ten copies of one or more copyrighted works with a retail value of more than $2500. He was further charged under 17 U.S.C. § 506(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319(b)(1) because the purpose of his infringement was for private financial gain.

Klimecek pleaded guilty. [Rec. Tab 9.] During the plea colloquy, he declared that he bought and installed hardware and software to set up a computer server and paid half of the monthly service charges to connect the server to the Internet. [Rec. Tabs 3-4.] In exchange, Klimecek was to obtain access to Czech movies and music. [Rec. Tab 6.] He admitted that he knew that Internet users from around the world were accessing the server to upload and download copyrighted works. [Rec. Tab 4.] The defendant also stated that during a 180-day period he caused at least ten or more copies of one or more copyrighted items to be uploaded to the server and thus made available for unauthorized download by Internet users. [Rec. Tab 5.] Klimecek admitted that the retail value of these copyrighted materials exceeded $2500. [Rec. Tabs 6-8.]

Even with the guilty plea, Klimecek got thirty months of prison under the Sentencing Guidelines. The court was not sympathetic to his arguments that he was a minor player and found that under the guidelines his conduct did not warrant a further downward departure.

The court also rejected the argument that the sentence was unreasonable. He had no criminal background, made next to no money on the scheme, and claimed he was not particularly sophisticated and thought he was just playing around with some friends.

Be very careful out there. Under the statute, a good chunk of the high-school and college population of the United States would probably qualify for some very hard time. Until the grandchildren of federal judges start getting hit with these sentences, they will continue to appear "reasonable" to the federal judiciary. Housing, feeding and guarding Klimecek for thirty months is an egregious waste of tax dollars and entirely disproportionate to the offense, which could largely be remedied (and give the copyright owners greater financial benefits) through painful but effective civil remedies or restitutionary penalties. Now that Klimecek will spend probably a couple of years in prison, there is little chance he'll be able to pay the level of restitution to the copyright owners that he would have been able to pay if he'd been permitted to work.

A suspended sentence conditioned on restitution would have been the economically prudent and just solution. Just because there is a stupid law on the books does not mean the prosecutor has to ask for a stupid sentence. Cf. Hugo, Victor, Les Miserables. And just because a law is on the books does not mean that the federal judiciary should abandon reason in favor of the Sentencing Guidelines.

BookCamp & Future of Books on the Tube

On Saturday I attended a fascinating event hosted by Penguin Books about books and "book-like" technologies called BookCamp 09. Regular readers of this blog will know that the future of reading & books is pet interest of mine. But it also seems like loads of you are also interested in it too - if the comments on a previous post on the Future of Books were anything to go by.


Saturday's event was no exception either and it was great to be in a space filled with publishers, authors, writers, geeks, web people, agents, bloggers, illustrators etc all exploring what might happen to the book in the future and whether or how our experience of reading will change.

Penguin Books have been a massive part of my life, as were their children's imprint, Puffin, when I was growing up. To me, they represent paperbacks & I still see loads of their orange spines & the familiar logo on my London Underground journeys. We were all kindly given a copy of The Penguin book of Penguin (pictured) above, which tells the story of the publisher and where it (and books) may be heading in the future.

Reading it on the Tube home, I learnt that Allen Lane, Penguin's founder, actually launched the business as a result of finding himself stranded on a railway platform with nothing to read. He searched a station kiosk in vain looking for something affordable, yet of good quality to read for his journey. The rest is history and it's interesting to see that at one time Penguin sold their books in "Penguincubators" dispensers like chocolate dispensers at stations


They've always been about spreading reading as widely as possible and it's great to see this includes an interest in non paper based books & online formats.

Many people at BookCamp, I'm sure will be blogging and writing about the event. We may even see a physical book as part of the discussions. Keep an eye on the wiki and Penguin's blog for more.

One of the sessions I found most interesting was on the future of children & books, led by fab children's author Alex Milway. We talked about whether children are reading more or less, what can be done (if anything) to make books capture short attention spans, can books ever compete with gaming, is gaming something that can help children read more or tell stories and whether any of this is important at the end of the day.

As Cory Doctorow who was at this session said, much of what we see in the media is not really celebrating kids that ARE reading but it focusses on kids who are not – ie the reluctant reader.


I don't see many teenagers reading books on the Tube - or rather I see a lot more adults reading books than kids. However, that's not to say they're not reading. Metro and free papers like the londonpaper seem to be really popular with teenagers.

How much of that is to do with them being free or whether today's commuting kids are more interested in the news than escaping with a book, I don't know. Perhaps it's the bitesize "internet-like" format of tabloids that's important to them.


However, as the dustjacket to the Penguin Book of Penguin says there's nothing about books to really stop them from being one of the most advanced forms of entertainment we have. Books can be paused at any time. We can re-wind or replay them if we miss a bit. There's infinite choice, they're free to share, a lot of them fit in our pockets & they're pretty cheap to run!

Some of my photos from BookCamp - a few more here

The more this "interactivity", fun and "shareability" is promoted, the more chance we'll have of reading continuing and not being a lost art to future generations. Whatever happens, the book in its physical paper form or in an ebook or other digital format isn't going to go away. Perhaps in the future I might be seeing fewer paperbacks on Tube journeys, but until e-readers and electronic books come down massively in price, I don't think that will be any time soon.

Google Maps gets Tube Overlay

If you use Google Maps you can now get a fairly handy 3rd party app which gives 50 major cities an overlay of public transport such as buses, trains and includes the London Underground.


vinf says "Would be especially useful if this would work with the Blackberry Google Maps application that I use all the time but I can't see a way to do that, overground rail networks and maybe bus routes would also be useful - but that would need a bit of detailed input from TfL (Transport for London) I would guess."

Thanks to McBazza and Simon G who both gave me the heads up for this.

Speaking of Tube maps, chichard41 sent me a link for the Milky Way Transit Authority, which as been inspired by the London Underground map.


The designer Samuel Arbesman says "This map is an attempt to approach our galaxy with a bit more familiarity than usual and get people thinking about long-term possibilities in outer space. Hopefully it can provide as a useful shorthand for our place in the Milky Way, the 'important' sights, and make inconceivable distances a bit less daunting.

I have attempted to actually make this map as accurate as possible, where each line corresponds to an arm of our galaxy, and the stations are actual places in their proper locations. However, I am not an astronomer or astrophysicist, so there are certainly inaccuracies, gaps, and room for improvement."

This is a great representation, but I wouldn't fancy trying the walk from Centaurus to Carina no matter how close they look on the map!

Emergency Radio rolled out on Tube

Airwave is across all of the London Underground from today. Before you worry that it's a huge advertising campaign from Wrigley's chewing gum, it's the roll out of a secure radio network for emergency services. The system had already been used above ground, but has now been rolled out across the network of tunnels and 125 below-ground Tube stations.

Policing Minister Vernon Coaker announced the service this morning and will visit Westminster London Underground Station later today to see the Airwave system in action.


The launch follows a London Assembly report in 2006, which said said poor communication hindered emergency services after the 7 July 2005 bomb attacks on London's transport system.

Airwave has actually been rolled out five months ahead of schedule in a £115 million deal. It will help police on the Tube respond to major incidents wherever they are on the network.

The Policing Minister said: "The Airwave system plays a vital part in keeping passengers safe. It allows police officers to communicate with each other quickly and safely to ensure an effective response to any incident.

"I am very pleased to announce that the system is now fully functioning ahead of schedule, helping frontline officers build on the excellent work they already do to tackle crime.

"Crime is down on the Underground and with the roll-out of Airwave, passengers can feel even more confident that every effort is being made to keep them safe as they travel around the Capital."

Tony McNulty, Minister for London said: "One of the key lessons from the London bombings of 2005 was the need to enhance the resilience of responders' telecommunications systems and communication underground. I am therefore delighted to see that this system is now fully in place, ahead of schedule, with the result that London is even more resilient and better prepared".

Airwave now "piggy-backs" onto a London Underground digital radio system called Connect. So the British Transport Police, no longer need to carry two radios - one for above ground, one for below.

This is all great news however, there are some concerns about whether the police network will be able to cope with demands during the 2012 Olympics when they are hosted here. Apparently the network "struggles" when a large number of users are concentrated in the same area. A security source told the BBC the system could collapse as demand is expected to increase in 2012 by 25-30%.

Also at the moment, Airwave is only available to the police. Roll out to all ambulance staff is still taking place and fire crews have a system they say works underground and is inter-operable with Airwave. However, not all crews have been given access yet.

Down in the Tube Station after Midnight

I mentioned in my interview with Londonist that Tube Lines invited myself & Londonist's M@ down to Leicester Square Tube one evening to see the overnight works. Thanks to Ianvisits, I found that Time magazine had published an amazing set of photos which show the London Underground after midnight and the work that goes on through the night. The overnight work is part of a multi billion pound TfL investment programme for the Tube.

Getty Images/Peter Macdiarmid

I particularly like this one of the modern day Fluffer (the term for London Underground cleaners & yes I know that Fluffer also has many other meanings). I never knew that cleaning of the lines was still done by hand.

I'd heard of the band of night-time workers (mainly women) called Fluffers or Fluffies who used to go into the tunnels and shift all of the hair and skin cells that accumulate on the Tube every day. They removed all of the dust, dirt and debris by hand with brushes and brooms.



The picture of the women was taken in 1955. The caption from the London Transport Museum says: "They are using special fluffer brushes that helped them collect the dust and fluff from around the rails. This was important because if the dust built up, it could affect the trackside equipment or cause fires. Fluffers went to work every night once the electricity to the tracks had been switched off."

Cleaning tracks by hand looks to me like one of the worst jobs in the world, but Evelyn Brown who worked on the London Underground for 13 years as a fluffer, seemed to have a reasonable time. She worked for LU in the 1960's & 1970's and remembers Friday nights in her team of 9 women. She told her story to her parish magazine:

"I took home made food into work and my friend Bernie took in whiskey. One weekend Mertle had too much whiskey and was ill, she was sick. She carried on working not realising she had lost her teeth. It was my other friend Rosie who found them on the platform in the morning. She worked the shift without her teeth, she was a bit tipsy"

Wonder what sorts of things are found by cleaners overnight on Tube lines and platforms these days?

It's interesting that cleaning the lines, now seems to be more of a male job, if the pictures from Time are anything to go by.

Getty Images/Peter Macdiarmid

The workers also seem much, much better dressed for the work. The hairnets have been replaced by hard hats & the dungarees by protective overalls & reflective jackets. I'd imagine they're also not allowed to have whiskey tipples down there either - although I'd need more than a few shots to do that work every night!

Tube Map on new Postage Stamps

This might be the smallest mass reproduction of the London Underground map we've seen, as from today the Tube Map will be featured on a new set of stamps. Thanks to the brill Version 3.1, I learnt that the Tube Map (and the Routemaster) are two of the British Design Classics featured on Royal Mail's latest Special Stamp Issue.


You can order a first day cover set of the stamps today for £4.61. If you miss ordering on the 13th, there's also a presentation pack (for £4.10) which explains what makes each stamp a design icon.

It's good to see the Tube map on a stamp as an enduring example of classic design, specially as it came second to Concorde a few years back, when the BBC Culture show, held a vote for Britain's Best Loved Design Icon.


I imagine, that Harry Beck would have been proud to see his map with the Queen's head on it, even though you'd need a hefty magnifying glass to read the map!

London Underground Interwar Art

Tonight art historian, Dr Jonathan Black, will give a talk about the London Underground's commissioning of leading modernists work in graphic arts & Tube posters. He'll be at the London Transport Museum where he'll explore an amazing variety of themes and influences ranging from technology and military strength to popular culture and film:


"The cosmopolitan line up of talent ranges from north Americian to British and European artists, including Austin Cooper (pictured above), McKnight Kauffer (pictured below), Tom Eckersley, Maurice Beck, Man Ray, Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, Julius Klinger and Hans Schleger."


I love these Art Deco posters. The Power poster by McKnight Kauffer is really typical of the industrialised style at the time. You can see the subtle use of the Tube roundel in the wheel which makes up a powerful forearm with electricity running through the veins.

Many people think that the power station in the top right corner is a drawing of Battersea Power Station, but it hadn't been built in 1930 when the poster was drawn.

"Pictures with a sting: the interwar modernist poster" starts at 6.30pm and will last for an hour. Tickets can be pre booked on 020 7565 7298 and cost £8.00 adults; £6.00 concessions; £4.00 students. Full details are on the London Transport Musuem's website.

Tube Sick

I was interviewed by Londonist over the weekend as part of their new series featuring London bloggers. The final question they asked me was whether I'd ever been sick on the Tube. I thought, that's a cool, yet yucky question for me (although later found out it's one of their signature questions). Thankfully, I've never been sick in a London Underground carriage. Although you can see my full answer in the interview here.

Fortunately I've never seen anyone throw up inside a Tube carriage, which is surprising as I travel around quite late & in trains where there's been much drunkeness. Even on the final Circle Line party before the ban on public transport booze, I didn't see anyone puking there.


However, I remembered that Marie F aka Tiger's Hungry, drew a little cartoon to illustrate what happened after she saw a woman throwing up on the Piccadilly Line one night.

"After an initial few moments of gawping most of the carriage quickly herded down the other end covering their mouths and offering the occasional insightful 'oh that's gross' - but I was happy to see other sympathetic travellers fumbling in their bags to offer her tissues (to her testament I think it was genuine 'not wellness' to blame rather than booze). She quickly departed at the next stop leaving a gaggle of tourists scrabbling to relocate their sick laden luggage.

"Yes the smell was bad for me, but at least it wasn't as bad as enduring what happened to the poor guy who got on at Holborn. Hastily boarding the carriage he lost his footing and after a few moments scrabbling about in the mess ended up on bended knee in the epicentre of events. To quote the experience in his words 'Oh f**ing lovely'. Yet he still valiantly took a hit for the team and stayed on the little end of carriage perch to warn fellow boarding travellers of the perils that lay within - and thankfully there was only a few future slippy near misses.

"Some nice guy offered him tissues to clean his trousers up, I had no tissues- so I just evilly laughed. It didn't really feel appropriate to take photos of the misfortune - but there is an artist's impression of events." (above)

Marie also pointed out that Armando Iannucci's Tube Tales 'Mouth' segment came to mind quite vividly. For those of you who aren't eating, you can see the short film below, which is a pretty colourful view of a late night Tube trip.


Err, welcome to blog Londonistas!

Attacks on Owners of Stolen Art

In the Guardian here, Jonathan Jones picks up on a call for a statute of limitations by Sir Norman Rosenthal from the last issue of the Art Newspaper reprinted here, in a post called "Should All Looted Art Be Returned".

The Art Newspaper queries whether Italy really needs another krater like the one pictured.

I suppose the question to be answered if someone steals my second car is whether or not I really needed a second one. If I could do with one, Rosenthal's bonehead argument is that the thief should keep my second one.

The comments to the debate have a healthy edge of antisemitism: the subtext is that people who want to recover their stolen property are greedy Jews, just trying to cash in. And how many museum directors and trustees are private collectors with similar stashes of stolen loot?

I reprint my comment below in italics:

Museums make claimants spent hundreds of thousands, if not millions in fees to researchers, lawyers, and by their refusal to return stolen property force claimants to enter into contingent fee arrangements with lawyers and researchers who, in turn, must force successful claimants to sell off their family heirlooms to cover their own costs.

Jones blames this vicious cycle on the victims. The public has no interest in showing their children warehouses of stolen property.

Change the laws to award attorneys fees and expenses to successful claimants and you will see Jewish families be able to afford to keep the property that is rightfully theirs. You will also see museums start to be a little more truthful about where they obtained their loot.
What Jonathan Jones and Norman Rosenthal advocate is looting the victims once again and proudly displaying the result. Shame.

London Underground Fancy Dress Party

Many people have held private fancy dress parties where you have to come dressed as a Tube station. That doesn't mean you cover yourself in crisp packets, graffiti, advertising posters and have a pigeon under your arm. You dress up as something that sounds like London Underground station name. However, I've just learnt of a public Tube fancy dress party on the 31st January.


It's organised by Bringstuff who say "We want you to come dressed as a visual interpretation of a Tube station - a blacksmith with a large hammer for Hammersmith, a manchester clown for Piccadilly Circus or James Bond for Bond Street etc"


"You get the idea, so be as creative as you can, with one exception. NO ANGEL COSTUMES - Angel Islington is off limits as it would be rubbish if everyone turned up in the same costume. "

Full details are on their website & entry's free before 10pm. If you're looking for ideas for Tube Fancy Dress party costumes, there's lots in the comments of the aforementioned post, or you might want to suggest some of your own.

I might be tempted to go along covered in mouldy ham representing a station I change at a lot on the District Line. Although that's a tad unsociable, so I'd probably dig out an old duffle coat, grab a small suitcase & a jar of marmalade and learn Peruvian for the evening.

Energy Saving Subway Station

Following on from yesterday's post on the London Underground's green products, I came across an interesting story on Current about an energy saving subway station in Tokyo.


Tadao Ando, the designer of Shibuya Station, told Wallpaper magazine "It's composed of a central void contained inside an egg-shaped shell and aims to reduce the station's dependency on air conditioning equipments by letting the outside air blow into the underground space, creating a natural ventilation system that is energy saving."

As the London Underground has very little dependency on air conditioning equipment (mainly because it currently doesn't have any - apart from comedic giant fans), I doubt whether we'll be seeing this in London any time soon.

Ando made some interesting points about orientation in the subway & how spatial improvements could help this:

"The existing underground stations in Tokyo are generally very confusing, generating a sense of disorientation, making it very difficult to find your way and getting around. This is due to the fact that it is very difficult to recognize your own position in relation to the street level's world and in addition to the constant shift of direction you are forced to make in the labyrinthine underground world. In order to help people's orientation in this underground world, giving them a sense of spatial perception and improving the functionality of the station, I created a 15 metre central void from concourse level B2 to the platform level B5, and wrapped it all up within a symbolic egg-shaped shell."


The station design looks amazing although not sure what the mirrored parts would do to my sense of spatial perception. Environmental blog Planet Green n Pink said "The idea behind the design was to keep a continuous flow of energy moving smoothly. That translates to a positive experience for the traveler and very good Feng Shui."

Good Feng Shui & a positive energy experience on your commute, please can have some Japanese design on London's Tube stations.

Eco friendly Tube products

Looks like the London Underground are doing their bit to help people get a little greener with some new products launched for their shop. Mags put me on to these Envelope Angels after seeing them as a Secret Santa gift in I like.


"They're labels you stick over the address on a used envelope to make it shiny enough to use again. They come in two models, original angelic and London Underground issue (above). They're really nicely designed - the box acts as a dispenser which you can refill, and Blue Marmalade, the people who make them are so nice they'll even recycle the plastic stickerbacks for you."

The Tube one is illustrated with a stretch of the Northern line leading to Angel station, and carries the slogan: 'Another journey for every envelope'. Hopefully it's a better journey than an average one on the Misery Line! They're only £5.86 for a pack which contains 100 "To: Labels" and 100 "From: labels". The company's tip is to include a label pair within each envelope you send and pass on the idea to those you mail.

Blue Marmalade also make some very cool looking pendant lampshades. They're made from single sheet of recyclable material and when they light up reveal the Tube map illuminated in their folds.


The lamps which are £24.27 come in Classic styles (for high ceilinged rooms) & Intimo (for more intimate settings!). They can be used with energy saver bulbs and bulbs up to 100W.

Apparently the fold-out design means there's not much waste during production and the material is also recyclable. Based in Edinburgh, Blue Marmalade aim to be as green as possible, and say that harmful chemicals and manufacturing processes are removed from their designs.

Trent Jennings from the company said: "The Underground map represents British graphic design at its best; it has strong functionality but also great visual impact." I think it's a great idea for a lamp and I'm sure it will be gracing my lounge very soon.